MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2020677429 · doi:10.12735/jbm.v3i4p48

The Influence of Accounting Information Systems (AIS) on Performance of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Iraq

2014· article· en· W2020677429 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Emad Harash, Suhail Al-Timimi, Ahmed Hussein Radhi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Business & Management · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFinancial Literacy and Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessRelevance (law)Accounting information systemSmall and medium-sized enterprisesReliability (semiconductor)AccountingCompetitive advantageKnowledge managementMarketingComputer scienceFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this paper is to investigate the influence use of Accounting Information System (AIS) performance in Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Iraq. The study discusses and explores the effects of the use of AIS on the performance of SMEs. The result of this study is expected to help the owners and manager of SMEs to understand the importance of the use of AIS to achieve performance. The use of AIS is influenced by several characteristics enjoyed by the accounting information such as: reliability, relevance, and timeliness that effect on SMEs' performance. The result of this study and modern literature shows that AIS characteristics enjoyed by the accounting information such as: reliability, relevance, and timeliness have significant effects on the use of AIS and SMEs ' performance. Prior researches have shown that is crucial for SMEs to use AIS to ensure business continuity and survival in the increasingly competitive environment and to enhance their business operations capability and efficiency. The study is one of few that shed light on how the use of AIS affects the performance of SMEs. In this study, the authors propose that dimensions of using AIS are important for improve the performance of SMEs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Business & ManagementSame topicFinancial Literacy and BehaviorFrench-language works237,207