Experimental Performance of Steel Beams under Blast Loading
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, the dynamic response of typical wide-flange steel beams was experimentally evaluated under blast loading. A total of 13 beams were field tested using live explosives, where the charge size ranged from 50 to 250 kg of ammonium nitrate-fuel oil mixture, and the ground stand-off distance was from 7.0 to 10.3 m. Blast wave characteristics, including incident and reflected pressures, were recorded. In addition, time-dependent displacements, accelerations, and strains at different locations along the steel members were measured, and the postblast damage and mode of failure of the test specimens were observed. The blast load characteristics were compared with those obtained using the Technical Manual UFC 3-340-02 results. The displacement response results were used to validate the results obtained from a nonlinear dynamic analysis based on a single degree-of-freedom (SDOF) model. Results showed that the UFC 3-340-02 pressure predictions compare reasonably well with the measured pressure in the positive phase in terms of both the peak pressure and overall time variations. The SDOF model predicted the maximum displacements of beams in the elastic range reasonably well, but it overestimated them in the plastic range.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".