MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2020689262 · doi:10.1080/14992020400029996

Dynamics of real time DPOAE contralateral suppression in chinchillas and humansDinámica de la supresión contralateral de las DPOAE en tiempo real en chinchillas y humanos

2005· article· es· W2020689262 on OpenAlexafffund
Adrian L. James, Robert V. Harrison, Martin Pienkowski, Hilmi R. Dajani, Richard J. Mount

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Audiology · 2005
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick Children
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchOklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station
KeywordsAudiologyStimulus (psychology)EfferentLatency (audio)Otoacoustic emissionNeurosciencePsychologyHearing lossMedicineAfferent

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dynamics of contralateral acoustic suppression were studied using real time (millisecond resolution) distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) in chinchillas and humans. Latency of DPOAE suppression onset is 26 ms in chinchillas and 45 ms in humans. After onset, suppression builds over time before tending to plateau, reflecting a temporal integration process with a time constant of 100 ms (chinchillas). In chinchillas, suppression persists for 40 ms even when elicited by stimuli as short as 5 ms. With stimuli >40 ms, offset and onset latencies are similar and duration of suppression equals that of the contralateral stimulus. A comparison of DPOAE suppression onset latency with neural latency data from the pathways involved suggests the following timing scheme: stimulus onset to activity in (ventral) cochlear nucleus, 4ms (15% of delay); transfer to olivocochlear efferents, 9 ms (35%); efferent conduction to presynaptic OHC site, 4ms (15%); synaptic and mechanical events at OHCs, 9 ms (35% of delay).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of AudiologySame topicHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsFrench-language works237,207