Emulsion copolymerization of vinyl acetate and butyl acrylate in the presence of fluorescent dyes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This article describes our first experiments for preparing dye‐labeled latex particles by the emulsion copolymerization of a 4/1 (w/w) mixture of vinyl acetate‐butylacrylate (VAc‐BA). We discuss the synthesis of acrylate derivatives of phenanthrene, anthracene, and pyrene [9‐acryloxymethyl phenanthrene ( 7 ), 9‐acryloxymethyl‐10‐methyl anthracene ( 8 ), and 1‐acryloxymethyl pyrene ( 10 )] and an allyl ether derivative of anthracene [9‐allyoxymethyl‐10‐methyl anthracene ( 9 )]. Although the phenanthrene derivative 7 gave latex particles with high monomer conversion and good dye incorporation, the pyrene acrylate and both anthracene comonomers strongly inhibited the free‐radical reaction. To assist our search for a dye that would serve as a useful energy acceptor for phenanthrene and without suppressing VAc‐BA polymerization, we also examined batch emulsion polymerization in the presence of a variety of dye derivatives—substituted anthracenes, acridines, a coumarin, and two benzophenone derivatives. All of the anthracene derivatives, as well as acridine, strongly inhibited monomer polymerization. The coumarin dye 7‐hydroxy‐4‐methyl coumarin ( 22 ) that had only limited solubility allowed more than 90% monomer conversion. Most promising were 2‐hydroxy‐5‐methyl benzophenone ( 23 ) and 4‐ N , N ‐dimethylamino benzophenone ( 24 ) that at 1 mol % in the monomer mixture permitted virtually quantitative monomer conversion to latex. 4′‐Dimethylamino‐2‐acryloxy‐5‐methyl benzophenone ( 25 ) copolymerized well with the VAc‐BA mixture, yielding latex particles in high yield and with a narrow size distribution. These dyes appear to be useful acceptor dyes for energy‐transfer experiments with phenanthrene. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 40: 1594–1607, 2002
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".