Skeletal Manifestations of Leprosy: Analysis of 137 Patients from Different Clinical Settings in the Pre- and Postmodern Treatment Eras
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study was conducted to further characterize the nature of leprosy-related bone alterations, to develop a hypothesis of their pathophysiology, and to define the impact of treatment on bone damage. Radiographs of 60 patients under care at the Carville, Louisiana leprosy hospital were compared with 50 from the early (before availability of effective treatment) part of this century and with 27 from the Toronto (Ontario, Canada) leprosy clinic. Two-thirds of lesions were so severe that distal digital tufts had been lost to whittling, resorption, or fragmentation. Fifty percent were felt to be pathognomonic for the changes of leprosy. Resorption, fragmentation, and malaligned fractures are highly suggestive of leprosy, while diaphyseal whittling appears specific when medullary sclerosis or wavy diaphyseal borders are present. Medicinal intervention appeared to be of limited benefit for bone damage; perhaps greater attention to joint/bone protection (as recommended in diabetes management) will prove helpful. Environmental adjustment to minimize injury risk and daily limb examination for injury are recommended.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".