MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2020766043 · doi:10.4141/cjas07139

Effect of α-tocopherol on in vitro maturation of bovine cumulus-oocyte complexes

2008· article· en· W2020766043 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Alexandre F. Marques, Priscila Helena dos Santos, Géssica Luana Antunes, A. Chaveiro, Fernando Moreira da Silva

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Animal Science · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOocyteIn vitro maturationIn vitroTocopherolAndrologyAntioxidantApoptosisChemistryMetaphaseBiologyVitamin ECell biologyEmbryoBiochemistryMedicineChromosome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study determined: the effects of α-tocopherol on apoptotic and necrotic levels of cumulus cells after in vitro maturation of bovine oocytes; whether exposure to α-tocopherol facilitates the development of bovine enclosed oocytes to metaphase II; and the effects of this antioxidant on apoptotic and necrotic levels of granulosa cells cultured in vitro. In conclusion, supplementation with α-tocopherol on in vitro maturation of bovine oocytes has a detrimental effect on the ability of oocytes to reach metaphase II, increasing the number of apoptotic and necrotic cumulus cells of bovine cumulus oocyte complexes (COC). This antioxidant showed a slight improvement in the viability of cultured granulosa cells at a concentration of 100 µM. Key words: Bovine, oocyte maturation in vitro, antioxidant, α-tocopherol

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Animal ScienceSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207