Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Seven Years' War (1756–1763) has been termed the first true world war, due to the geographical extent of the conflict (five continents were involved), the widespread participation by European states and their overseas colonies and allies, and the duration and ferocity of the fighting. Despite this, it has never captured the wholehearted attention of historians and the public. Much of the uninterest can be ascribed to a few key factors: the baffling diplomatic complexity of the conflict, its lack of a propelling ideology or a larger-than-life charismatic leader, and—with the exception of France's loss of Canada—its seemingly indecisive outcome. Recent decades have seen a number of excellent scholarly studies of the war, most of which have focused on the “French and Indian War” campaigns in North America. Comprehensive studies of the entire conflict are relatively few, however, and most date from the early twentieth century. In The French Navy and the Seven Years' War, the historian Jonathan R. Dull goes for the big picture, picking a high vantage point and giving his readers a remarkably detailed look at the political, diplomatic, military, and naval events of the war.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".