Allopregnanolone prevents and suppresses oxaliplatin-evoked painful neuropathy: Multi-parametric assessment and direct evidence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oxaliplatin (OXAL) is a platinum-based drug used for the treatment of colorectal, lung, breast and ovarian cancers. OXAL does not cause renal or hematologic toxicity. However, OXAL induces neuropathic pain which hampers the chemotherapy success. Attempts with neuroprotective agents including anticonvulsivants and antidepressants were made to prevent OXAL-induced painful neuropathy but the clinical data are controversial and the tested neuroprotectors are able to evoke themselves undesirable effects. Here, we demonstrated that the natural neurosteroid allopregnanolone (3α,5α-THP), known to be devoid of toxic side-effects in humans and experimental models, prevented and suppressed OXAL-induced painful neuropathic symptoms. Indeed, 3α,5α-THP repaired OXAL-evoked neurochemical and functional alterations in peripheral nerves and intra-epidermal nerve fibers (IENF). Behavioral analyses showed that prophylactic or corrective 3α,5α-THP treatment (4mg/kg/2days) respectively prevented or abolished OXAL-induced cold allodynia, mechanical allodynia and hyperalgesia by reversing to normal decreased thermal and mechanical pain thresholds of OXAL-treated rats. Electrophysiological investigations revealed that 3α,5α-THP restored control values of sciatic nerve conduction velocity and action potential peak amplitude drastically reduced by OXAL-treatment. Furthermore, immunohistochemistry and confocal microscopic quantifications demonstrated that 3α,5α-THP repaired OXAL-induced neurochemical/cellular alterations by restoring IENF control density and normal level of neurofilament 200kDa that was strongly repressed by OXAL in dorsal root ganglion neurons and sciatic nerve axons. OXAL showed no toxicity for the non-compact myelin protein 2',3'-cyclic-nucleotide-3'-phosphodiesterase whose expression level was similarly increased by 3α,5α-THP in controls and OXAL-treated rat nerves. Together, these results may be interesting for the development of natural or safe neurosteroid-based neuroprotective strategy against anticancer drug-evoked painful neuropathy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".