MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2020858488 · doi:10.1063/1.481289

Solute molecular dynamics in a mesoscale solvent

2000· article· en· W2020858488 on OpenAlexafffund
Anatoly Malevanets, Raymond Kapral

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMaterial Dynamics and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMesoscale meteorologySolventMolecular dynamicsAutocorrelationBrownian motionStatistical physicsDissipative particle dynamicsPhysicsDynamics (music)Brownian dynamicsChemical physicsChemistryClassical mechanicsThermodynamicsComputational chemistryQuantum mechanicsMathematicsPolymerMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A hybrid molecular dynamics (MD) algorithm which combines a full MD description of solute–solute and solute–solvent interactions with a mesoscale treatment of solvent-solvent interactions is developed. The solvent dynamics is modeled on a mesoscale level by coarse graining the system into cells and updating the velocities of the solvent molecules by multiparticle collisions within each cell. The solvent dynamics is such that the correct hydrodynamic equations are obtained in the macroscopic limit and a Boltzmann distribution of velocities is established in equilibrium. Discrete-time versions of the hydrodynamic equations and Green–Kubo autocorrelation functions are derived. Between the discrete-time solvent–solvent collisions the system evolves by the classical equations of motion. The hybrid MD scheme is illustrated by an application to the Brownian motion of a nanocolloidal particle in the mesoscale solvent and concentrated nanocolloidal suspensions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations490
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicMaterial Dynamics and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207