MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2020861611 · doi:10.1136/bmj.b289

Imaging after trauma to the pelvis and hip

2009· article· en· W2020861611 on OpenAlexaff
Brad Petrisor, Mohit Bhandari

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPelvic and Acetabular Injuries
Canadian institutionsHamilton General HospitalHamilton Health Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdvanced trauma life supportMedicinePelvisRadiographyGlasgow Coma ScaleChest radiographCervical spineSurgeryRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The driver of a vehicle in a head-on collision was brought by ambulance to the emergency room on a spine board with the cervical spine immobilised. The trauma team carried out a full primary and secondary survey according to ATLS (advanced trauma life support) protocol. Vital signs were stabilised after initial resuscitation, and the Glasgow coma scale score was 15. An isolated injury to the left hip was identified and the hip was flexed and adducted, and his leg was internally rotated. There were no open injuries to the left leg, and the distal neurological and vascular examination revealed no deficits. An anteroposterior pelvic radiograph was done as part of the secondary survey trauma series of radiographs (fig 1⇓). Fig 1 Initial presenting anteroposterior pelvic radiograph ### Short answers

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.655
Threshold uncertainty score0.125

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJSame topicPelvic and Acetabular InjuriesFrench-language works237,207