MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2020891654 · doi:10.1109/ofc.2006.215617

Optical transceivers for passive optical networks (PON)

2006· article· en· W2020891654 on OpenAlexaff
Wei‐Ping Huang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Photonic Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransceiverPassive optical networkOptical line terminationFiber to the x10G-PONOptical cross-connectOptical performance monitoringComputer scienceMultiwavelength optical networkingContext (archaeology)Fiber optic splitterTelecommunicationsKey (lock)Electronic engineeringOptical Transport NetworkComputer networkOptical fiberWavelength-division multiplexingEngineeringWavelengthPhysicsOpticsWirelessFiber optic sensor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Optical transceivers used for the passive optical networks (PON) are bi-directional devices that use different wavelengths to transmit and receive signals between the optical line terminal (OLT) at the central office and the optical network units (ONUs) at the end users' premises over a single fiber. One of the key issues for the PON transceivers is the performance/cost ratios measured by the technical specs and the unit cost of the optical hardware. In this paper, we took a close look at the current status of the transceiver technologies in the context of FTTP PON applications. In particular, recent development of the emerging technologies are reviewed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Photonic Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207