MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2020902645 · doi:10.1109/glocomw.2014.7063545

Device-centric radio access virtualization for 5G networks

2014· article· en· W2020902645 on OpenAlexaff
Amine Maaref, Jianglei Ma, Mohamed Salem, Hadi Baligh, Keyvan Zarifi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsHuawei Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceRadio access networkComputer networkVirtualizationQuality of serviceCellular networkRadio resource managementNetwork virtualizationBase stationCloud computingWireless networkWirelessTelecommunicationsOperating systemMobile station

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we introduce a virtualized device-centric radio access architecture for future fifth-generation (5G) mobile networks. Radio access networks (RAN)s have traditionally relied on Voronoi tessellations of cells, created by a careful deployment of access nodes, to enable spatial frequency reuse over those cells. With the trend firmly set to decouple the control- and user-planes for next-generation 5G mobile networks, we foresee radio access technology breaking away from the concept of cells and embracing a virtualized device-centric architecture. The aim for this paradigm shift is to meet the stringent quality of service (QoS) requirements of densely populated networks irrespective of users' physical proximity to the access nodes. Focusing on downlink user-plane (U-plane) virtualization, this paper proposes a device-centric hyper-transceiver (HT) design that capitalizes on group-to-group (G2G) communications between virtual multipoint transmission and reception nodes and proactively optimizes both sets of virtual nodes via dynamic point selection (DPS) enabled by cloud-RAN (CRAN) architecture and semi-static network-assisted receiver cooperation enabled by device-to-device (D2D) short-range communications, respectively. Using a full-fledged event-based system level simulator compliant with the 3rdgeneration partnership project (3GPP) long-term evolution advanced (LTE-Adv) specifications, our results show that the proposed virtualized U-plane architecture provides more than 50% average throughput and 200% coverage gains over LTE-A Release 11 baseline under some typical simulation scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCooperative Communication and Network CodingFrench-language works237,207