MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2020913397 · doi:10.1086/301482

The Galactic Supersoft X-Ray Binary RX J0925.7−4758 (MR Velorum)

2000· article· en· W2020913397 on OpenAlexaff
P. C. Schmidtke, A. P. Cowley, V. A. Taylor, D. Crampton, J. B. Hutchings

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astronomical Journal · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Canadian institutionsDominion Astrophysical ObservatoryHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsLight curveRadial velocityOrbital periodStarsAstronomyOutflowJet (fluid)Binary starBinary numberAmplitudeX-ray binaryNeutron starOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New simultaneous photometric and spectroscopic observations of the supersoft X-ray binary RX J0925.7-4758 (MR Vel) have been obtained. These confirm the unusually long orbital period near 3.8 days. An accurate period is determined based on several years of photometric observations. Short-term photometric variability (∼0.25 days) is also present, but it does not appear to be strictly periodic. The spectroscopic behavior reveals large-amplitude He II and H velocity curves, indicating that the system is viewed from a moderately high inclination angle. Masses for the component stars are derived. Evidence of a high-velocity jet (outflow velocity of 5350 km s -1 ) is present at Hα. Its radial velocity curve is very similar to the disk emission lines, suggesting the jet is formed near the compact star. A new model for the system is presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astronomical JournalSame topicAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsFrench-language works237,207