MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2020936081 · doi:10.1121/1.4786779

Broadband barrel-stave flextensional transducers

2006· article· en· W2020936081 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dennis F. Jones

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSonarBroadbandAcousticsUnderwaterTransducerNova scotiaDirectivityGeologyOceanographyEnvironmental scienceMarine engineeringTelecommunicationsComputer scienceEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The last time I discussed underwater transduction technologies with Joe Blue was at the 125th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America in May 1993. As we enjoyed lunch on the patio of a downtown Ottawa bistro under a sunny spring sky, the discussion touched on broadband transducers for naval applications. His ideas were insightful, motivating me to redesign and improve my original 1989 broadband barrel-stave flextensional transducer the following year. Over the last decade 30 experimental units were built at DRDC Atlantic, most of them used in marine mammal and coastal surveillance applications [D.F. Jones, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 2447 (2005); 118, 2038–2039 (2005)]. This paper will present electroacoustic measurements made at both the DRDC Atlantic Acoustic Calibration Barge on Bedford Basin near Halifax, Nova Scotia and the NAVSEA Seneca Lake Sonar Test Facility near Dresden in upstate New York. The performance parameters of interest include resonance frequencies, mechanical quality factors, transmitting voltage response versus water depth, and directivity patterns. [Work supported in part by the Office of Naval Research.]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207