Van der Waals Nanocapsular Complexes of Amphiphilic Calixarenes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The inclusion complexes of p -alkanoyl calix[4]arenes with alkanoyl chain lengths from C4 to C10 (C4OH−C10OH) and tetrahydrofuran, dioxane, and some halocarbons as guests were prepared and their structures were studied by single-crystal X-ray diffraction, TGA, DSC, and 13 C CP-MAS NMR. The complexes of C6OH are nanocapsules stabilized by van der Waals interactions between the calixarene cavity as extended by the alkanoyl chains and one or more guest molecules. The stability of the nanocapsule compounds depends strongly on the size and saturation vapor pressure of the guests, as well as on the presence of halogen atoms in the guest molecule. In the presence of the latter, the C6OH capsular complexes have markedly lower stability and easily eject the guests. C4OH calixarene prefers to form open-container type complexes, whereas it is possible to prepare quasicapsular complexes of C10OH with dioxane as a guest. In this case, two dioxane molecules are encapsulated by two molecules of calixarene and the third dioxane molecule provides interlayer stabilization of the crystal lattice by hydrogen bonding of dioxane oxygens with OH groups of the neighboring calixarenes. The general trends in the formation and stability of van der Waals capsular complexes of amphiphilic calixarenes are discussed, as well as how they relate to the formation of solid lipid nanoparticles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".