Long-term effects of the PPARγ activator pioglitazone on cardiac inflammation in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We investigated the long-term effects of the thiazolidinedione PPARgamma activator pioglitazone on cardiac inflammation in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRSP), a model of malignant of hypertension. Six-week-old SHRSP were treated with pioglitazone (10 mg/kg per day p.o.) for 20 weeks. The rise in systolic blood pressure (SBP) in SHRSP was only transiently and slightly attenuated by pioglitazone (P < 0.05). On one hand, cardiac hypertrophy was little affected by the pioglitazone treatment, and there was only a reduction of subepicardial interstitial fibrosis. On the other hand, left ventricular NFkappaB and AP-1 binding activities, the expression of TNFalpha, and the adhesion of molecule PECAM were significantly decreased by pioglitazone treatment. Expression of the pro-apoptotic proteins p53 and bax was significantly increased by pioglitazone. Thus, pioglitazone-attenuated cardiac inflammation in SHRSP had little effect on BP or cardiac hypertrophy. PPARgamma activation may play a preventive cardiovascular role by offsetting the cardiac inflammatory response as demonstrated in this genetic model of malignant hypertension.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".