MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2020971142 · doi:10.6108/kspe.2014.18.1.008

The Effect of Pressure and Oxidation Mole Fraction on Ablation Rate of Graphite for Nozzle Throat Insert

2014· article· en· W2020971142 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Heecheol Hahm, Yoon‐Goo Kang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Korean Society of Propulsion Engineers · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRocket and propulsion systems research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPropellantNozzleGraphiteMole fractionAblationMaterials sciencePropulsionCombustionMass fractionAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Composite materialChemistryAerospace engineeringThermodynamicsEngineeringPhysicsChromatographyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

고체 로켓 추진기관의 노즐목 삽입재에 적용하는 그라파이트의 삭마율 특성을 분석하였다. 지상연소시험은 3종류의 일반적인 노즐형태를 갖는 추진기관을 사용하여 수행하였다. 즉, De-Laval 형태, 토출관 형태, 내삽 형태이다. 13종류의 서로 다른 형상의 추진기관에 다양한 추진제를 적용하였고, 노즐목 위치에 그라파이트를 적용하여 총 37회의 연소시험을 수행하였다. 분석결과 그라파이트의 삭마율은 연소실 평균압력이 상승함에 따라, 산화몰분율이 증가함에 따라 증가함을 알 수 있다. The ablation characteristics of graphite nozzle throat insert is analyzed for the use in solid rocket propulsion system. The propulsion system is composed of three types of conventional nozzles, such as De-Laval type, blast tube type, and submerged type. Various kinds of propellants are used in the thirteen kinds of propulsion system that has different shapes of each other. Total thirty seven tests are performed. From the results of the analysis, it is found that the ablation rate is higher for the higher average chamber pressure and the higher concentration of oxidizing species in combustion gas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.252

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Korean Society of Propulsion EngineersSame topicRocket and propulsion systems researchFrench-language works237,207