MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2020979217 · doi:10.5244/c.21.76

Higher-order Autoregressive Models for Dynamic Textures

2007· article· en· W2020979217 on OpenAlex
M. Eric Hyndman, Allan Jepson, David J. Fleet

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutoregressive modelComputer scienceWhite noiseArtificial intelligenceEntropy (arrow of time)AutocorrelationMotion estimationGaussian processAlgorithmMotion (physics)Pattern recognition (psychology)Computer visionGaussianMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dynamic textured sequences are characterized by the interactions between many particles or objects in the scene. Based on earlier work the images of the sequence are interpreted as the output of a linear autoregressive process driven by white Gaussian noise. We extend earlier work by increasing the amount temporal information included when learning the motion in the scene, allowing the models to capture complex motion patterns which extend over multiple frames, thereby increasing the perceptual accuracy of the synthesized results. To overcome problems of dynamic model stability, we apply Burg’s Maximum Entropy Spectral Analysis technique for parameter estimation, which is found to be reliably stable on smaller samples of training data, even with higher-order dynamics. 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.706
Threshold uncertainty score0.354

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage and Signal Denoising MethodsFrench-language works237,207