MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Measurement of isolated photon production in deep inelastic ep scattering

2010· article· en· W2021017090 on OpenAlexafffund
S. Chekanov, M. Derrick, S. Magill, B. Musgrave, D. Nicholass, J. Repond, R. Yoshida, M.C.K. Mattingly, P. Antonioli, G. Bari, L. Bellagamba, D. Boscherini, A. Bruni, G. Bruni, F. Cindolo, M. Corradi, G. Iacobucci, A. Margotti, R. Nania, A. Polini, S. Antonelli, M. Basile, M. Bindi, L. Cifarelli, A. Contin, S. De Pasquale, G. Sartorelli, A. Zichichi, D. Bartsch, I. Brock, H. Hartmann, E. Hilger, H.‐P. Jakob, M. Jüngst, A.-E. Nuncio-Quiroz, E. Paul, U. Samson, V. Schönberg, R. Shehzadi, M. Wlasenko, J. D. Morris, M. Kaur, P. Kaur, I. Singh, M. Capua, S. Fazio, A. Mastroberardino, M. Schioppa, G. Susinno, E. ̃Tassi, J.Y. Kim, Z. A. Ibrahim, F. Mohamad Idris, B. Kamaluddin, W. A. T. Wan Abdullah, Y. Ning, Z. Ren, F. Sciulli, J. J. Chwastowski, A. Eskreys, J. Figiel, A. Galas, K. Olkiewicz, B. Pawlik, P. Stopa, L. Zawiejski, L. Adamczyk, T. Bołd, I. Grabowska-Bołd, D. Kisielewska, J. Łukasik, M. Przybycień, L. Suszycki, A. Kotański, W. Słomiński, O. Bachynska, O. Behnke, J. K. Behr, U. Behrens, C. Blohm, K. Borras, D. Bot, R. Ciesielski, N. Coppola, S. Fang, A. Geiser, P. Göttlicher, J. Grebenyuk, Ingrid Gregor, T. Haas, W. Hain, A. Hüttmann, F. Januschek, B. Kahle, I.I. Katkov, U. Klein, U. Kötz, H. Kowalski, V. Libov, M. Lisovyi, E. Lobodzinska, B. Löhr, R. Mankel, I.-A. Melzer-Pellmann, S. Miglioranzi, A. Montanari, T. Namsoo, D. Notz, A. Parenti, P. Roloff, I. Rubinsky, U. Schneekloth, A. Spiridonov, D. Szuba, J. Szuba, T. Theedt, J. Tomaszewska, G. Wolf, K. Wrona, A. G. Yagües-Molina, C. Youngman, W. Zeuner, V. Drugakov, W. Lohmann, S. Schlenstedt, G. Barbagli, E. Gallo, P.G. Pelfer, A. Bamberger, D. Dobur, F. Karstens, N. Vlasov, P. Bussey, A. T. Doyle, M. Forrest, D. H. Saxon, I. O. Skillicorn, I. Gialas, K. Papageorgiu, U. Holm, R. Klanner, E. Lohrmann, H. Perrey, P. Schleper, T. Schörner-Sadenius, J. Sztuk, H. Stadie, M. Turcato, K. Long, A. Tapper, T. Matsumoto, K. Nagano, K. Tokushuku, S. Yamada, Y. Yamazaki, A.N. Barakbaev, E.G. Boos, N.S. Pokrovskiy, B.O. Zhautykov, V. Aushev, M. Borodin, І. Каденко, Ie. Korol, O. Kuprash, D. Lontkovskyi, I. Makarenko, Y. Onishchuk, A. Salii, Iu. Sorokin, A. Verbytskyi, V. Viazlo, O. Volynets, O. Zenaiev, M. Zolko, D. Son, J. de Favereau, K. Piotrzkowski, F. Barreiro, C. Glasman, M. Jiménez, J. del Peso, E. Ron, J. Terrón, C. Uribe-Estrada, F. Corriveau, J. Schwartz, C. Zhou, T. Tsurugai, A. Antonov, B. A. Dolgoshein, D. Gladkov, V. Sosnovtsev, A. Stifutkin, S. Suchkov, R. K. Dementiev, P. Ermolov, L. K. Gladilin, Yu. A. Golubkov, L. A. Khein, I. A. Korzhavina, V. A. Kuzmin, B. B. Levchenko, O.Yu. Lukina, A.S. Proskuryakov, L.M. Shcheglova, D. S. Zotkin, I. Abt, A. Caldwell, D. Kollár, B. Reisert, W. B. Schmidke, G. Grigorescu, A. Keramidas, E. Koffeman, P. Kooijman, A. Pellegrino, H. Tiecke, M. Vázquez, L. Wiggers, N. Brümmer, B. Bylsma, L. S. Durkin, A. Lee, T. Y. Ling, A. M. Cooper-Sarkar, R. C. E. Devenish, J. Ferrando, B. Foster, C. Gwenlan, K. Horton, K. Oliver, A. Robertson, R. Walczak, A. Bertolin, F. Dal Corso, S. Dusini, A. Longhin, L. Stanco, R. Brugnera, R. Carlin, A. Garfagnini, S. Limentani, B.Y. Oh, A. Raval, J. Whitmore, Y. Iga, G. D’Agostini, G. Marini, A. Nigro, J.C. Hart, H. Abramowicz, R. Ingbir, S. Kananov, A. Levy, A. Stern, M. Ishitsuka, T. Kanno, M. Kuze, J. Maeda, R. Hori, N. Okazaki, S. Shimizu, R. Hamatsu, S. Kitamura, O. Ota, Y.D. Ri, M. Costa, M.I. Ferrero, V. Monaco, R. Sacchi, V. Sola, A. Solano, M. Arneodo, M. Ruspa, S. Fourletov, J.F. Martin, T. P. Stewart, S. Boutle, J. M. Butterworth, T.W. Jones, J.H. Loizides, M. Wing, B. Brzozowska, J. Ciborowski, G. Grzelak, P. Kulinski, P. Łużniak, J. Malka, R.J. Nowak, J. M. Pawlak, W. Perlański, A. F. Żarnecki, M. Adamus, P. Plucinski, T. Tymieniecka, Y. Eisenberg, D. Hochman, U. Karshon, E. Brownson, D. D. Reeder, A. A. Savin, W. H. Smith, H. Wolfe, S. Bhadra, C.D. Catterall, G.F. Hartner, U. Noor, J. Whyte

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics Letters B · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityUniversity of TorontoMcGill University
FundersDeutsches Elektronen-SynchrotronNuclear PhysicsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaLomonosov Moscow State UniversityUniversità degli Studi di SalernoFonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRSKorea Science and Engineering FoundationFonds pour la Formation à la Recherche dans l’Industrie et dans l’AgricultureBelgian Federal Science Policy OfficeBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungScience and Technology Facilities CouncilStrongU.S. Department of EnergyRussian Foundation for Basic ResearchChonnam National UniversityMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyQueen Mary University of LondonNational Science Foundation
KeywordsHERAPhysicsPseudorapidityParticle physicsDeep inelastic scatteringZEUS (particle detector)Perturbative QCDNuclear physicsPhotonQuantum chromodynamicsMonte Carlo methodScatteringPartonHadronParton showerInelastic scatteringCharged particleOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Isolated photon production in deep inelastic ep scattering has been measured with the ZEUS detector at HERA using an integrated luminosity of 320 pb − 1 . Measurements were made in the isolated-photon transverse-energy and pseudorapidity ranges 4 < E T γ < 15 GeV and − 0.7 < η γ < 0.9 for exchanged photon virtualities, Q 2 , in the range 10 < Q 2 < 350 GeV 2 and for invariant masses of the hadronic system W X > 5 GeV . Differential cross sections are presented for inclusive isolated photon production as functions of Q 2 , x , E T γ and η γ . Leading-logarithm parton-shower Monte Carlo simulations and perturbative QCD predictions give a reasonable description of the data over most of the kinematic range.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.487

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics Letters BSame topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesFrench-language works237,207