Étude de quelques mots obscurs du Qohélet à la lumière de l'histoire de l'exégèse et des manuscrits judéo-persans de la Bibliothèque nationale de France
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Il existe plusieurs mots ou expressions dans le livre du Qohélet qui n'ont jamais été clarifiés avec certitude, aussi bien par les versions anciennes que par les interprètes médiévaux et modernes. À la lumière de l'histoire de l'exégèse et, pour la première fois dans l'histoire, à la lumière des traductions proposées par les quatre manuscrits judéo-persans provenant de la Bibliothèque nationale de France, la présente étude en analyse six: deux expressions (š iddā wešiddōt en 2,8 et ba'alē y ăsupôt en 12,11) et quatre verbes ( bûr en 9,1 et 'izzēn, hiqqēr et tiqqén en 12,9). Il ressort clairement de cet examen que la vérité du comprendre s'adapte constamment à la finitude de chaque langue, chaque culture et chaque époque et que, par conséquent, le sens du Qohélet se constitue dans l'histoire même de sa réception.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".