MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021075112 · doi:10.3791/2050

Measuring Calpain Activity in Fixed and Living Cells by Flow Cytometry

2010· article· en· W2021075112 on OpenAlexafffund
Christina Farr, Stuart A. Berger

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Visualized Experiments · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCalpain Protease Function and Regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchLeukemia and Lymphoma Society of CanadaLeukemia and Lymphoma Society
KeywordsCalpainProteasesCell biologyFlow cytometryBiologyApoptosisSplenocyteChemistryMolecular biologyImmunologyBiochemistryImmune systemEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Calpains are ubiquitous intracellular, calcium-sensitive, neutral cysteine proteases. Calpains play crucial roles in many physiological processes, including signaling, cytoskeletal remodeling, regulation of gene expression, apoptosis and cell cycle progression. Calpains have been implicated in many pathologies including muscular dystrophies, cancer, diabetes, Alzheimer's disease and multiple sclerosis. Calpain regulation is complex and incompletely understood. mRNA and protein levels correlate poorly with activity, limiting the use of gene or protein expression techniques to measure calpain activity. This video protocol details a flow cytometric assay developed in our laboratory for measuring calpain activity in fixed and living cells. This method uses the fluorescent substrate BOC-LM-CMAC, which is cleaved specifically by calpain, to measure calpain activity. In this video, calpain activity in fixed and living murine 32 Dkit leukemia cells, alone or as part of a splenocyte population is measured using an LSRII (BD Bioscience). 32 Dkit cells are shown to have elevated activity compared to normal splenocytes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.356

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Visualized ExperimentsSame topicCalpain Protease Function and RegulationFrench-language works237,207