Confirmation of the Assignment of the Dombrock Blood Group Locus <i>(DO)</i> to Chromosome 12p: Narrowing the Boundaries to 12p12.3&ndash;p13.2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Antigens belonging to the Dombrock blood group system have been well characterized serologically. Despite being reasonably polymorphic, chromosomal localization of the gene controlling Dombrock expression (DO) has proved difficult. In the past, DO had been provisionally assigned to chromosomes 1 and 4; more recently, DO was provisionally assigned to chromosome 12. The current study was undertaken in an attempt to confirm or refute this latest assignment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DNA from a series of families segregating for DO was amplified by polymerase chain reaction and analyzed for trinucleotide or tetranucleotide repeat polymorphisms of four anonymous DNA markers (D12S1042, D12S373, D12S391, D12S372) and of the von Willebrand factor gene (VWF). Lods for or against linkage were determined between DO and each marker. RESULTS: DO is linked to all five markers. The closest linkage was established between DO and D12S373, and DO and D12S391, with peak lods for combined paternal and maternal meioses of 7.16 at peak recombination fraction (theta) = 0.08 and 7.69 at theta = 0.08, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We have confirmed the assignment of the Dombrock blood group locus to chromosome 12p and have refined its regional localization to 12p12.3-p13.2.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".