MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021117587 · doi:10.1021/jp012067u

On the Anharmonic XCN Bending Modes of the Quasilinear Molecules BrCNO and ClCNO

2001· article· en· W2021117587 on OpenAlexaff
Holger Lichau, C. W. Gillies, J. Z. Gillies, Stephen C. Ross, Brenda P. Winnewisser, Manfred Winnewisser

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicInorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnharmonicityBendingMoleculePhysicsStructural engineeringEngineeringCondensed matter physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The millimeter-wave spectra of the unstable halofulminates BrCNO and ClCNO were recorded at room temperature in several frequency intervals between 52 and 230 GHz. Besides rotational transitions in the vibrational ground state, transitions in numerous thermally excited states of the XCN bending mode (X = Br or Cl) could be observed. The irregular sequence of these satellites indicated that in both molecules, the XCN bending mode is highly anharmonic. Indeed, the XCNO molecules exhibit truly quasilinear behavior. From semirigid bender analyses of the rotational data, the effective potential functions and their barriers to linearity were determined. The barrier heights were found to be 130.82 (56) cm -1 for BrCNO and 166.86 (84) cm -1 for ClCNO, resulting in quasilinearity parameters γ 0 of +0.362 and +0.416, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry ASame topicInorganic Fluorides and Related CompoundsFrench-language works237,207