Pena‐Shokeir phenotype (Fetal akinesia deformation sequence) revisited
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pena and Shokeir described the phenotype of two sisters in 1974, and subsequently their features have become recognized as a sequence of deformational changes related to decreased or absent fetal movement (fetal akinesia deformation sequence [FADS]), because of the work of Moessinger (1983). METHODS: Identification of reported cases by searching Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man, Medlines, the London Dysmorphology Database, and the references found in these articles. These case reports were reviewed, tabulated, and summarized. RESULTS: It is now possible to recognize at least 20 familial types of Pena-Shokeir phenotype (PSP), based on the differences found in the reports of the natural history and pathology found at fetal and newborn autopsy. In addition, characteristic changes in the central nervous system seen with embryonic/fetal vascular compromise have been recognized in many reported cases. Most of the reported cases of PSP/FADS related to vascular compromise are sporadic, but familial cases have also been reported. CONCLUSION: Lack of fetal movement (fetal akinesia) in humans produces a recognizable sequence of deformations. Many developmental processes must be accomplished for fetal movement to be normal, and for extra-uterine life to be sustainable. Prenatal diagnosis is possible through real-time ultrasound studies as early as 12 weeks. Most reported cases die in utero, at birth, or in the newborn period. Advances in embryo/fetus pathology have led to the recognition of the many familial subtypes, allowing improved genetic counseling and early recognition in subsequent pregnancies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".