MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021145162 · doi:10.1118/1.4735742

SU-F-BRCD-04: Efficient Scatter Distribution Estimation and Correction in CBCT Using Concurrent Monte Carlo Fitting

2012· article· en· W2021145162 on OpenAlexaff
Gregory Bootsma, Frank Verhaegen, David A. Jaffray

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDigital Radiography and Breast Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonte Carlo methodDistribution (mathematics)Computer sciencePhysicsStatistical physicsNuclear medicineMathematicsMedicineStatisticsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: X-ray scatter is a known source of image artifacts, contrast reduction, and CT number inaccuracy in cone-beam CT (CBCT). We present and demonstrate the performance of a novel scatter correction method based on an algorithm that simultaneously combines multiple Monte Carlo (MC) CBCT scatter simulations through the use of a fitting function. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The scatter estimation system consists of concurrently run MC CBCT scatter projection simulations that are a sub-sample of the projection angles used in the reconstruction projection set, P, to be corrected. The photons generated by each MC simulation are simultaneously aggregated in an algorithm which computes the scatter detector response, S(i,j,k), for each down-sampled projection location (i,j) and angle (k). S(i,j,k) is fit to a function, FS, and if FS is determined to have a specified goodness of fit value the simulations are terminated. FS is subtracted from P which is subsequently used to create a scatter corrected reconstruction. The scatter correction method was applied to simulated phantoms using a frequency limited sum of sines and cosines as the fitting function. Image quality in the corrected reconstruction was evaluated using metrics looking at contrast, noise, and artifact reduction. RESULTS: Fitting the scatter distribution to a limited sum of sine and cosine functions, using a low-pass filtered Fast Fourier transform, provides a computationally efficient and accurate fit. Scatter distribution estimates for a 360 image projection set were computed in under one minute. The scatter correction algorithm increased the contrast-to-noise ratio by 46%, reduced the shading artifact by 87%, and decreased the skin line artifact by 79% in reconstructions of a simulated pelvis phantom. CONCLUSION: The algorithm provides an efficient method for estimating and removing the scatter distribution in from CBCT projection images. The results on simulated data show a significant increase in image quality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.818
Threshold uncertainty score0.414

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical PhysicsSame topicDigital Radiography and Breast ImagingFrench-language works237,207