Traveling convection vortices induced by solar wind tangential discontinuities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two typical magnetic impulse events (MIEs) accompanied by traveling convection vortices (TCVs) are investigated. The analysis of their conjugate equivalent convection patterns is performed using magnetic field data obtained from high‐latitude ground magnetometer networks in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres. A three‐dimensional analysis of solar wind structures is also performed using solar wind data obtained from multiple International Solar‐Terrestrial Physics satellites. In the first event observed at ∼1310 UT on 22 May 1996, a westward moving TCV appeared simultaneously in the noon‐to‐dawn sector in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres. The solar wind source of this TCV is found to be a tangential discontinuity (TD), which causes a rapid northward turning of the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) and abrupt dynamic pressure changes. In the second event observed at ∼1610 UT on 27 May 1998, an eastward moving TCV appeared in the noon sector in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres, with a timing delay of 2 to 3 min in the Southern Hemisphere. The solar wind source of this TCV is found again to be a TD, which causes a rapid IMF By negative turning and an abrupt enhancement of dynamic pressure. Analyses show that the TDs driving these events have their motional electric fields pointing toward the TDs and their normal vectors with large cone angles from the sunward direction. These TDs satisfy the conditions for the formation of a hot flow anomaly (HFA) at the bow shock. The sweeping motion across the magnetosphere of the intersection of the TD and the bow shock is found to be consistent with the observed TCV motion in each event. Magnetopause deformations due to HFAs can explain all the observed morphological features and the triggering process of these two MIEs. It is suggested, however, that bursty merging and/or pressure pulses would reinforce the processes produced by the HFAs, since the TDs are usually accompanied by both abrupt IMF changes and pressure enhancements. Consequently, it seems reasonable to conclude that the integrated processes of HFA, bursty magnetic field merging, and pressure pulses produce the evolution of these MIEs and TCVs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".