Preadolescent Indomethacin‐Responsive Headaches Without Autonomic Symptoms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: A small case series is presented of preadolescent patients with indomethacin-responsive headache. BACKGROUND: Preadolescent indomethacin-responsive headache is a rare and poorly understood entity, with few published cases in the literature. RESULTS: Two young children had similar presentations of indomethacin-responsive headaches. Both patients experienced frequent paroxysmal episodes of sudden-onset severe frontal or temporal head pain. The events lasted seconds to minutes in duration, and varied in frequency ranging from multiple episodes per week to multiple events per day. There were no associated autonomic or migrainous symptoms, and a comprehensive work-up revealed no secondary causes for the debilitating headaches. Both patients had dramatic clinical improvement with indomethacin. CONCLUSIONS: There may be a pediatric syndrome of indomethacin-responsive headache without autonomic symptoms that does not fit well within current diagnostic classifications. More research is needed to determine appropriate dosage and duration of treatment in pediatric indomethacin-responsive headache. Once secondary causes have been ruled out, a trial of indomethacin should be considered in pediatric patients presenting with severe paroxysmal headaches, even if no autonomic symptoms are present.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".