Mapping<i>cis</i>-acting regulatory variation in recombinant congenic strains
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present an integrated approach for the enriched detection of genes subject to cis-acting variation in the mouse genome. Gene expression profiling was performed with lung tissue from a panel of recombinant congenic strains (RCS) derived from A/J and C57BL/6J inbred mouse strains. A multiple-regression model measuring the association between gene expression level, donor strain of origin (DSO), and predominant strain background identified over 1,500 genes (P < 0.05) whose expression profiles differed according to the DSO. This model also identified over 1,200 genes whose expression showed dependence on background (P < 0.05), indicating the influence of background genetic context on transcription levels. Sequences obtained from 1-kb segments of 3'-untranslated regions identified single nucleotide polymorphisms in 64% of genes whose expression levels correlated with DSO status, compared with 29% of genes that displayed no association (P < 0.01, Fisher exact test). Allelic imbalance was identified in 50% of genes positive for expression-DSO association, compared with 22% of negative genes (P < 0.05, Fisher exact test). Together, these results demonstrate the utility of RCS mice for identifying the roles of proximal genetic determinants and background genetic context in determining gene expression levels. We propose the use of this integrated experimental approach in multiple tissues from this and other RCS panels as a means for genome-wide cataloging of genetic regulatory mechanisms in laboratory strains of mice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".