MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021192251 · doi:10.4155/bio.14.188

Large-Scale Label-Free Phosphoproteomics: from Technology to Data Interpretation

2014· review· en· W2021192251 on OpenAlexaff
Hongbo Guo, Ruth Isserlin, Andrew Lugowski, Uroš Kuzmanov, Andrew Emili

Bibliographic record

VenueBioanalysis · 2014
Typereview
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhosphoproteomicsScale (ratio)Computer scienceData scienceNanotechnologyComputational biologyBiochemical engineeringChemistryBiologyEngineeringMaterials sciencePhysicsBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Protein phosphorylation plays a central role in the dynamic intracellular signaling and the control of biochemical pathways in all living cells. Recent advances in high-performance MS/MS-based technology make the large-scale identification and quantification of phosphorylation sites possible. Here, we review the full data generation pipeline, starting from sample preparation methods and LC-MS detection procedures, through to data processing and analysis software tools that facilitate the systematic comparative profiling of thousands of phosphoproteins in different biological specimens in a single experiment. We emphasize current challenges and promising avenues for the mechanistic interpretation and visualization of global phosphorylation networks and their relevance to human health and disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioanalysisSame topicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207