Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bien avant l’arrivée d’Émile Nelligan qui incarnera, au Québec, le type du « poète malheureux », un roman de l’abbé Clovis Pinard, Gilbert ou le poète malheureux (Paris, Mame, 1840), a circulé de main en main et diffusé dans les pays catholiques de langue française la légende de Gilbert, grand frère de toutes les « lyres brisées » du XIXe siècle. Au Canada, cet ouvrage est l’un de ceux qui ont ouvert les esprits à un nouveau modèle de poète et à une nouvelle manière d’envisager la poésie : non plus comme un délassement ou un geste à valeur patriotique, mais comme une vocation. En interrogeant les modes de diffusion et le cadre de réception de ce livre par les contemporains de Louis-Honoré Fréchette, nous souhaitons apporter une première contribution à l’étude du transfert du mythe de la malédiction littéraire dans le Canada du XIXe siècle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".