MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021251429 · doi:10.1145/2185395.2185407

A self-promoting priority model for transplant queues (abstract only)

2012· article· en· W2021251429 on OpenAlexaff
Steve Drekic, David A. Stanford, Douglas G. Woolford

Bibliographic record

VenueACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier UniversityWestern UniversityUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQueuePriority queueWaiting listPriority inheritancePresentation (obstetrics)Computer scienceOperations managementPsychologyOperations researchMedicineTransplantationComputer networkMathematicsEconomicsInternal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In many jurisdictions, organ allocation is done on the basis of the health status of the patient, either explicitly or implicitly. This presentation presents a Matrix-analytic priority model in which customers self-promote to the higher priority level, to take into account changes in health status over time. In the first variant, all patients arrive as "regular" customers to the queue, but as the health of a patient degrades, their status is promoted to "priority" to reflect the increased urgency of the transplant. Performance measures such as the mean and distribution of the time until transplant are obtained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.252
GPT teacher head0.496
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation ReviewSame topicHealthcare Operations and Scheduling OptimizationFrench-language works237,207