MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021269907 · doi:10.3917/cite.023.0143

Le mouvement des femmes québecois : état des lieux

2005· article· fr· W2021269907 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCités · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Depuis la fin des annes 1960, le Qubec a t le thtre d'un dploiement sans prcdent de discours, de revendications et de pratiques fministes.Dans cette mouvance, le mouvement des femmes s'est progressivement impos comme un acteur significatif de la scne qubcoise, en raison mme du poids de sa prsence sur le terrain, de la pertinence et de la diversit de ses luttes, de la porte de ses pratiques et de la pluralit de ses lieux de mobilisation 1 . la fois produit de la contestation des femmes l'gard de l'omniprsence des catgories de sexe dans la structuration/hirarchisation des rapports sociaux au sein d'une socit trs longtemps fige dans un conservatisme social et religieux et d'une stricte adhsion une conception naturaliste du destin des femmes, le mouvement des femmes qubcois est devenu, au fil des ans, la courroie de transmission de projets intellec-

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.844
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it