MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021283654 · doi:10.1103/physreva.64.013405

Intense-field laser ionization rates in atoms and molecules

2001· article· en· W2021283654 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review A · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Matter Interactions and Applications
Canadian institutionsSteacie Institute for Molecular Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIonizationAtomic physicsPhysicsMolar ionization energies of the elementsAtmospheric-pressure laser ionizationField desorptionCoulomb explosionMoleculeIonPhotoionizationAmbient ionizationLaserChemical ionizationOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We discuss experiments on the ionization of atoms and molecules in intense laser fields, designed to facilitate a comparison of theory and experiment especially in the case of complex molecules. We concentrate on ionization in the regime where single ionization dominates. We describe an approach which allows a direct measurement of ionization efficiencies, absolute ionization rates, and well-defined saturation intensities. In addition, intensities where multiple ionization and Coulomb explosion set in are determined. We also analyze how ion yields are sensitive to any dependence of ionization rates on molecular alignment. Application of these procedures to molecular ionization is demonstrated in detail for the organic molecules benzene and cyclohexane.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.557
Threshold uncertainty score0.241

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it