MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021284607 · doi:10.1142/s0217751x01008473

Probing the Infrared Structure of Gauge Theories: A Padé-Approximant Approach

2001· article· en· W2021284607 on OpenAlexaff
Farrukh Chishtie, V. Elias, V. A. Miransky, T. G. Steele

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Modern Physics A · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicScientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsInfraredQuantum chromodynamicsGauge theoryFlavourInfrared fixed pointGauge (firearms)Function (biology)Padé approximantFermionAttractorMathematical physicsTheoretical physicsParticle physicsQuantum mechanicsRenormalization groupMathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Padé-approximant treatments of the known terms of the QCD β-function are seen to develop possible infrared fixed point structure only if the number of fermion flavours is sufficiently large. This flavour threshold is seen to be between six and nine flavours, depending upon both the specific choice of approximant as well as on the presently-unknown five-loop β-function contribution. Below this flavour threshold, Padé approximants based upon the QCD β-function manifest the same infrared attractor structure as that which characterizes the exact NSVZ β-function of supersymmetric gluodynamics. Such infrared attractor structure is also seen to characterize Padé-approximant treatments of vector SU(N) gauge theory in the large N limit, suggesting common infrared dynamics for the strong and weak phases of this theory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.140
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Modern Physics ASame topicScientific Measurement and Uncertainty EvaluationFrench-language works237,207