Robust model predictive control of shimmy vibration in aircraft landing gears with probabilistic uncertainty
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper considers robust model predictive control (RMPC) methods for linear parameter varying (LPV) system which has both probabilistic uncertain and time-varying parameters. The parameters are considered to be measured on-line. In this regard, the aircraft landing gear system is considered as a LPV system whose parameters variation can affect both stability and performance. By transforming this system into a convex combination of linear time-invariant vertices form with the tensor-product (TP) model transformation method, the landing gear system is represented as a polytopic linear parameter-varying system. A computationally efficient RMPC law is formulated for this system which guarantees closed-loop robust stability and performance. The control signal is calculated on-line by carrying out the convex optimization involving Linear Matrix Inequalities (LMIs) in MPC. The proposed controller can effectively suppress the shimmy vibration of the landing gear with variable taxiing velocity and wheel caster length, also with the probabilistic uncertain torsional spring stiffness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".