Three-Way Analysis of Fluorescence Spectra of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons with Quenching by Nitromethane
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The application of trilinear decomposition (TLD) to the analysis of fluorescence excitation-emission matrices of mixtures of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) is described. The variables constituting the third-order tensor are excitation wavelength, emission wavelength, and concentration of a fluorescence quencher (nitromethane). The addition of a quencher to PAH mixtures selectively reduces the fluorescence intensity of mixture components according to the Stern-Volmer equation. TLD allows the three-way matrix to be decomposed to give unique solutions for the excitation spectrum, emission spectrum, and quenching profiles for each component. The availability of spectra and calculated Stern-Volmer constants can aid in the identification of unknown components. Preprocessing of the data to correct for Rayleigh/Raman scatter and primary absorption by the quencher is necessary. Both three-component (anthracene, pyrene, 1-methylpyrene) and four-component (fluoranthene, anthracene, pyrene, 2,3-benzofluorene) synthetic mixtures are successfully resolved by TLD using quencher concentrations up to 100 mM. Results are compared using both alternating least-squares and direct trilinear decomposition algorithms. The reproducibility of extracted Stern-Volmer constants is determined from replicate experiments. To illustrate the application of TLD to a real sample, a chromatographic cut from the analysis of a light gas oil sample was used. Analysis of the TLD extracted spectra and quenching constants suggests the presence of three classes of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons consistent with data from a second dimension of chromatography and mass spectrometry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".