Note critique. Identités et droits indigènes : six ouvrages récents sur les Autochtones
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Note critique.Identités et droits indigènes : six ouvrages récents sur les Autochtones 1 Parmi les dizaines d'ouvrages en français sur les Autochtones du Québec et du Canada parus au cours des dernières années, nous allons examiner six titres que l'on peut relier, malgré la diversité apparente des sujets, à la problématique des droits territoriaux et de l'identité amérindienne et inuit dans le monde d'aujourd'hui.Dans La gestion de l'étranger, l'ethnohistorien Claude Gélinas se penche sur l'histoire culturelle des Atikamekw de la Haute-Mauricie de 1760 à 1870.Il s'agit d'un travail extrêmement fouillé, où l'auteur examine tour à tour la vie traditionnelle (avant 1760) des Atikamekw, les principales caractéristiques de leur vie sociale et de leur culture au temps du commerce des fourrures (1760-1831), ainsi que les contacts qu'ils ont entretenus avec la Compagnie de la baie d'Hudson et les missionnaires catholiques à partir de 1831, contacts qui ont mené à leur sédentarisation progressive après 1850.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.019 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.012 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".