MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021347112 · doi:10.2174/187221508786241729

Recent Patents of Gene Sequences Relative to DNA Polymerases

2008· review· en· W2021347112 on OpenAlexaff
Linda J. Reha-Krantz

Bibliographic record

VenueRecent Patents on DNA & Gene Sequences · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDNA polymeraseDNA polymerase IIDNA clampIn vitro recombinationBiologyPrimaseCircular bacterial chromosomePolymeraseDNA polymerase muDNA replicationGeneticsDNAEukaryotic DNA replicationMolecular biologyGeneMolecular cloningPolymerase chain reactionReverse transcriptaseComplementary DNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Organisms with DNA genomes encode one or more DNA polymerases that are essential enzymes for chromosome replication, DNA repair and recombination. The ability of DNA polymerases to copy DNA templates has been exploited in a variety of in vitro reactions to sequence, amplify, mutate, label and recombine DNA, and in several other applications that are fundamental to molecular biology. Because natural DNA polymerases may have activities that interfere with in vitro applications or their substrate specificity is too narrow, DNA polymerases have been modified for specific applications. Patents are reviewed here on natural and variant DNA polymerases and their uses. Keywords: DNA polymerases, Variant DNA polymerases, DNA replication, DNA polymerase applications, DNA sequencing, DNA amplification (PCR), DNA recombination, DNA labeling, Mutating DNA, Evolving DNA polymerases

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecent Patents on DNA & Gene SequencesSame topicCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringFrench-language works237,207