MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021350091 · doi:10.1063/1.2126125

Compton scattering of elemental silicon at high pressure

2005· article· en· W2021350091 on OpenAlexaff
J. S. Tse, D. D. Klug, Dawei Jiang, Christian Sternemann, M. Volmer, Simo Huotari, N. Hiraoka, V. Honkimäki, K. Hämäläinen

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicHigh-pressure geophysics and materials
Canadian institutionsCanadian Light Source (Canada)Steacie Institute for Molecular SciencesUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompton scatteringMonochromatorSiliconScatteringSynchrotron radiationOpticsMaterials scienceMetastabilityPhysicsOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The electronic structure of elemental silicon has been studied under high pressure using high-energy Compton scattering utilizing synchrotron radiation. The experiment was realized using a special Laue monochromator and a novel assembly of compound refractive lenses. The extremely good focusing enabled us to utilize a Mao–Bell version of the Merrill–Basset diamond anvil cell with a Be gasket up to a pressure of 20 GPa. After the careful subtraction of background scattering, the Compton profile difference for the metastable Si-XII to the Si-V phase was extracted and compared with the theory. The results clearly demonstrate the feasibility and potential of the Compton scattering technique as a complementary tool in the study of electronic structure of materials under high pressure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics LettersSame topicHigh-pressure geophysics and materialsFrench-language works237,207