MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021371722 · doi:10.1024/0040-5930.62.7.481

Inseltransplantation bei Typ 1 Diabetes mellitus

2005· review· de· W2021371722 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
H. Lehmann, Pavlicek, Spinas, Weber

Bibliographic record

VenueTherapeutische Umschau · 2005
Typereview
Languagede
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic function and diabetes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGynecologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Type 1 diabetes mellitus results from autoimmune destruction of the insulin-secreting cells in the pancreas. The dramatic breakthrough in 2000 with the "Edmonton protocol" for successful solitary islet transplantation has restored optimism for the application of islet transplantation as a treatment for type I diabetes. Due to the recent successes, islet transplantation has evolved from a theoretical concept to its current status as a therapeutic option for patients with type 1 diabetes. Islet transplantation has shown to normalize metabolic control in a way that has been virtually impossible to achieve with exogenous insulin. The less invasive procedure of islet transplantation as compared to whole pancreas transplantation in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus would be expected to be safer and much less costly. However, this procedure also requires lifetime immunosuppression with drugs. The limited availability of donor organs and the necessity of transplantation of several pancreata in order to achieve insulin independence limit this procedure to a small minority of patients. Unlike the North American centers, the European centers concentrated their efforts on islet after kidney and simultaneous islet kidney transplantation. The two Swiss islet transplantation programs have been pioneers in applying the steroid-free "Edmonton protocol" to simultaneous islet-kidney and islet after kidney transplantation. The long term follow-up showed that islet function decreases over time. In order to maintain insulin independence repeated islet transplants would have to be given to the patients. Therefore, there has been a change in paradigm over time. The major goal of islet transplantation focuses now on achieving a good blood glucose control and avoidance of severe hypoglycaemic episodes rather than only insulin-independence. Thus, due to the limited supply of donor organs, more patients can benefit from islet transplantation. Small insulin doses of exogenous insulin prevent stress on the islet in particular after meals and might help to maintain the transplanted islet mass over time. Due to the severe limitations of immunosuppression solitary islet transplantation is limited to a very small number of patients with type 1 diabetes. The most common indication for islet transplantation in Switzerland is terminal kidney failure in patients with type I diabetes. A simultaneous islet-kidney or pancreas-kidney transplantation should be offered to these patients. The choice between islet or pancreas transplantation is a matter of age and diabetic complications because the perioperative risk is considerably higher in pancreas transplantation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTherapeutische UmschauSame topicPancreatic function and diabetesFrench-language works237,207