MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021381561 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424734

Cool dust heating and temperature mixing in nearby star-forming galaxies

2014· article· en· W2021381561 on OpenAlexaff
L. K. Hunt, B. T. Draine, S. Bianchi, Karl D. Gordon, G. Aniano, Daniela Calzetti, Daniel A. Dale, G. Hélou, J. L. Hinz, Robert C. Kennicutt, H. Roussel, C. D. Wilson, Alberto D. Bolatto, M. Boquien, K. V. Croxall, M. Galametz, A. Gil de Paz, Jin Koda, J. C. Muñoz-Mateos, Karin Sandström, M. Sauvage, L. Vigroux, S. Zibetti

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNational Science Foundation
KeywordsAstrophysicsGalaxyPhysicsEmissivityInterstellar mediumRADIUSExtinction (optical mineralogy)AstronomyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Physical conditions of the interstellar medium in galaxies are closely linked to the ambient radiation field and the heating of dust grains.In order to characterize dust properties in galaxies over a wide range of physical conditions, we present here the radial surface brightness profiles of the entire sample of 61 galaxies from Key Insights into Nearby Galaxies: Far-Infrared Survey with Herschel (KINGFISH).The main goal of our work is the characterization of the grain emissivities, dust temperatures, and interstellar radiation fields (ISRFs) responsible for heating the dust.We first fit the radial profiles with exponential functions in order to compare stellar and cool-dust disk scalelengths, as measured by 3.6 μm and 250 μm surface brightnesses.Our results show that the stellar and dust scalelengths are comparable, with a mean ratio of 1.04, although several galaxies show dust-to-stellar scalelength ratios of 1.5 or more.We then fit the far-infrared spectral energy distribution (SED) in each annular region with single-temperature modified blackbodies using both variable (MBBV) and fixed (MBBF) emissivity indices β, as well as with physically motivated dust models.The KINGFISH profiles are well suited to examining trends of dust temperature T dust and β because they span a factor of ∼200 in the ISRF intensity heating the bulk of the dust mass, U min .Results from fitting the profile SEDs suggest that, on average, T dust , dust optical depth τ dust , and U min decrease with radius.The emissivity index β also decreases with radius in some galaxies, but in others is increasing, or rising in the inner regions and falling in the outer ones.Despite the fixed grain emissivity (average β ∼ 2.1) of the physically-motivated models, they are well able to accommodate flat spectral slopes with β < ∼ 1.An analysis of the wavelength variations of dust emissivities in both the data and the models shows that flatter slopes (β < ∼ 1.5) are associated with cooler temperatures, contrary to what would be expected from the usual T dust -β degeneracy.This trend is related to variations in U min since β and U min are very closely linked over the entire range in U min sampled by the KINGFISH galaxies: low U min is associated with flat β < ∼ 1.Both these results strongly suggest that the low apparent β values (flat slopes) in MBBV fits are caused by temperature mixing along the line of sight, rather than by intrinsic variations in grain properties.Finally, a comparison of dust models and the data show a slight ∼10% excess at 500 μm for low metallicity (12 + log (O/H) < ∼ 8) and low far-infrared surface brightness (Σ 500 ).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations74
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207