La enfermedad de Melibea: dos perspectivas médicas de la ægritudo amoris en Celestina
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La crítica tradicional siempre se ha mostrado benévola con uno de los más importantes personajes de Celestina, Melibea. Se ha tomado a la joven como ejemplar personificación de la heroína trágica, que se suicida en aras de un amor ya imposible. Si bien es verdad que esta valoración cuenta todavía con no pocos adeptos, también lo es que otros muchos no la perciben de manera tan indulgente y sí más cercana a las intenciones de su (último) creador, Femando de Rojas. Rastrear con detalle lo expuesto por los más caracterizados estudiosos que se atrincheran en esta última posición está muy lejos del propósito de estas líneas, aunque no huelga recordar —a título ilustrativo— los nombres de dos de ellos, Salvador de Madariaga y Eukene Lacarra Lanz.…
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".