MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021400560 · doi:10.3989/rfe.2001.v81.i1/2.169

La enfermedad de Melibea: dos perspectivas médicas de la ægritudo amoris en Celestina

2001· article· es· W2021400560 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de Filología Española · 2001
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEarly Modern Spanish Literature
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La crítica tradicional siempre se ha mostrado benévola con uno de los más importantes personajes de Celestina, Melibea. Se ha tomado a la joven como ejemplar personificación de la heroína trágica, que se suicida en aras de un amor ya imposible. Si bien es verdad que esta valoración cuenta todavía con no pocos adeptos, también lo es que otros muchos no la perciben de manera tan indulgente y sí más cercana a las intenciones de su (último) creador, Femando de Rojas. Rastrear con detalle lo expuesto por los más caracterizados estudiosos que se atrincheran en esta última posición está muy lejos del propósito de estas líneas, aunque no huelga recordar —a título ilustrativo— los nombres de dos de ellos, Salvador de Madariaga y Eukene Lacarra Lanz.…

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.920
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it