MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021438816 · doi:10.1121/1.4779014

NOAA efforts in monitoring of low-frequency sound in the global ocean

2002· article· en· W2021438816 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Christopher G. Fox, Robert P. Dziak, Haruyoshi Matsumoto

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubmarine pipelineOceanographySeamountNavySound (geography)GeologyInduced seismicityRange (aeronautics)HydrophoneSeismologyEnvironmental scienceGeographyArchaeologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since August 1991, NOAA/PMEL has collected continuous recordings from the U.S. Navy SOSUS arrays in the North Pacific. In May 1996, this effort was expanded through the use of PMEL-developed autonomous hydrophones deployed in the eastern equatorial Pacific, and later to the central North Atlantic between 15N and 35N (March 1999), the Gulf of Alaska (October 1999), and the North Atlantic between 40N and 50N (June 2002). Natural seismicity in the Pacific produces nearly 10 000 events per year with source levels exceeding 200 dB (re: 1 micro-Pa @ 1 m), with about 3500 events per year exceeding this level in the North Atlantic. Significant contributions from manmade sources are present throughout the data but have not been quantified. Recordings from North Atlantic arrays are dominated by noise from seismic airgun profilers working offshore Canada, Brazil, and west Africa. In September 2001, a cabled vertical hydrophone array was installed at Pioneer Seamount, offshore central California, which will provide continuous, unclassified acoustic data (in the range of 1–450 Hz) to the research community in real time. Future plans call for the expansion of the NOAA monitoring effort to other opportunities worldwide and making the raw data available to the community via the Internet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.130
Threshold uncertainty score0.258

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207