MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021452569 · doi:10.1109/tcst.2013.2289934

Optical Parametric Oscillator Longitudinal Modes Suppression Based on Smith Predictor Control Scheme

2014· article· en· W2021452569 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParametric statisticsControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemTransfer functionLongitudinal modeFunction (biology)Term (time)Smith predictorPhysicsMathematicsOpticsComputer scienceEngineeringControl (management)StatisticsTemperature controlQuantum mechanicsLaser

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fiber optical parametric oscillators (FOPOs) contain multiple longitudinal modes arising from the hundreds of meters to a kilometer scale length of their cavity. To obtain better understanding of the longitudinal modes and to find out how to suppress them, a model for the operation of FOPOs is introduced. This model utilizes the sinusoidal-input describing function (SIDF) as a quasi-linear approximation of the nonlinear dynamics of parametric amplification. Applying this model, the SIDF of the FOPO is derived, which predicts that the origin of the longitudinal modes is the presence of the cavity round-trip delay term in the characteristic equation (the denominator) of the transfer function. To eliminate the effect of the delay term, a modified Smith predictor control scheme has been applied to the FOPO cavity, and a control algorithm is developed. This algorithm has been numerically analyzed and experimentally implemented, where the results indicate drastic suppression of the longitudinal modes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it