MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021471817 · doi:10.4310/maa.2002.v9.n3.a6

Central Limit Theorem for Zero-Range Processes

2002· article· en· W2021471817 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMethods and Applications of Analysis · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStochastic processes and statistical mechanics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsCentral limit theoremZero (linguistics)Martingale (probability theory)SemigroupLimit (mathematics)Mathematical physicsMathematical analysisCombinatoricsPure mathematicsApplied mathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider additive functionals t 0 V (s)ds of symmetric zero-range processes, where V is a mean zero local function. In dimensions 1 and 2 we obtain a central limit theorem for a -1 (t) t 0 V (s)ds with a(t) = t log t in d = 2 and a(t) = t 3/4 in d = 1 and an explicit form for the asymptotic variance 2 . The transient case d 3 can be handled by standard arguments [KV, SX,S]. We also obtain corresponding invariance principles. This generalizes results obtained by Port (see [CG]) for noninteracting random walks and Kipnis [K] for the symmetric simple exclusion process. Our main tools are the martingale method together with L 2 decay estimates [JLQY] for the process semigroup. 0 p t (0, 0)dt in d 3, where p t (x, y) are the transition probabilities of the corresponding continuous time random walk. The recurrence of the individual particles is responsible for the unusual scaling in one and two dimensions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.152
Threshold uncertainty score0.317

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it