MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021486027 · doi:10.1159/000324903

A Combination Procedure with Double C-Shaped Skin Incision and Dual-Floor Burr Hole Method to Prevent Skin Erosion on the Scalp and Reduce Postoperative Skin Complications in Deep Brain Stimulation

2011· article· en· W2021486027 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueStereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurological disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of Knowledge EconomyYonsei University
KeywordsScalpMedicineSurgeryDeep brain stimulationParkinson's disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to introduce a combination procedure with double C-shaped skin incision and an adjusted dual-floor burr hole to prevent skin complications on the scalp with deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery. METHODS: Between March 2000 and March 2010, 504 DBS electrodes were implanted in 268 patients. We included both bilateral and unilateral DBS surgery cases for Parkinson's disease, tremor, pain, obsessive-compulsive disorder and intractable seizure accompanied with cranial and IPG insertion procedure, but excluded motor cortex stimulation, and spinal cord stimulation. We used a straight skin incision in 118 patients, double C-shaped skin incision only in 113 patients since March 2006, and combined a double C-shaped skin incision and dual-floor burr hole in 37 patients since August 2009. We compared scalp wound complications and the height subscale of the Vancouver Scar Scale between previous straight or C-shaped skin incision and the combination procedure. RESULTS: We had eight scalp erosions associated with infection (3.0%) and six disconnection (2.2%) cases among 268 patients. Before the use of the double C-skin incision or adjusted dual-floor burr hole technique, we had 5 (4.2%) scalp erosion cases among 118 patients. With the introduction of the C-shaped incision, only 3 patients (2.7%) developed scalp erosion. However, no patient among 37 patients developed scalp erosion after using both double C-shaped skin incision and dual-floor burr hole technique. Scalp bump measured by the height subscale of the Vancouver Scar Scale was more cosmetic in the combination procedure. CONCLUSION: The combination procedure prevents skin complications associated with DBS surgery, with tensile strength, less impaired vascular supply and better cosmetic outcome. This promising approach prevents unwanted skin complications associated with DBS surgery and improves patient satisfaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.346
Threshold uncertainty score0.482

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it