MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021501173 · doi:10.1109/tcsi.2006.883863

Partial-Update <formula formulatype="inline"><tex>${L}_{\infty}$</tex> </formula>-Norm Based Algorithms

2007· article· en· W2021501173 on OpenAlexaff
Abhishek Tandon, M. N. S. Swamy, M. Omair Ahmad

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Fundamental Theory and Applications · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlgorithmMathematicsNorm (philosophy)Adaptive filterHyperplaneFilter (signal processing)Convergence (economics)Rate of convergenceComputer scienceCombinatoricsKey (lock)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The computational complexity of an adaptive filtering algorithm increases with increasing the filter tap length and therefore, the use of such a filter can become prohibitive for certain applications, especially for real-time implementation. In this paper, we develop low-complexity adaptive filtering algorithms by incorporating the concept of partial updating of the filter coefficients into the technique of finding the gradient vector in the hyperplane based on the$L_{\infty}$-norm criterion. Two specific partial update algorithms based on the sequential and$M$-Max coefficient updating are proposed. The statistical analyses of the two algorithms are carried out, and evolution equations for the mean and mean-square of the filter coefficient misalignment as well as the stability bounds on the step size are obtained. It is shown that the proposed partial update algorithm employing the$M$-Max coefficient updating can achieve a convergence rate that is closest to that of the full update algorithm. Finally, simulations are carried out to validate the theoretical results and study the convergence rate of the proposed algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.100

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Fundamental Theory and ApplicationsSame topicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering TechniquesFrench-language works237,207