MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021514164 · doi:10.9722/jgte.2014.24.2.217

An Exploration of the Direction of Development of the Integrated Curriculum for Gifted: The Applicability of the Drake Model

2014· article· en· W2021514164 on OpenAlex
Kyung‐Jin Lee, IlSoon Roh

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Gifted/Talented Education · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducation and Learning Interventions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumCLARITYCurriculum theoryIntegrated curriculumMathematics educationCurriculum mappingCurriculum developmentEmergent curriculumPerspective (graphical)Engineering ethicsPsychologySociologyPedagogyComputer scienceEngineeringArtificial intelligenceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

본 연구에서는 학문중심 통합교육과정 관점으로 영재를 위한 통합교육과정을 개발할 수 있는지 그 가능성을 탐색하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 학문중심 통합교육과정 관점의 대표적인 모형인 Drake 모형을 기반으로 개발된 캐나다 온타리오 주의 통합교육과정을 분석하고, 과학영재학교 교육과정에의 적용 가능성을 탐색하였다. 온타리오 주의 사례는 학교 교육과정 내에 '큰 아이디어(Big Idea)'를 중심으로 통합교육과정을 개설하여 선택된 전공과정의 심화뿐만 아니라 타 학문과의 통합시도, 미래 문제의 해결을 위한 통합 적용 등의 가능성을 보여줌으로써 교과과정 내에서 또는 개인별 심화연구까지 통합을 통한 연구 가능성을 제시해주었다. Drake 모형에 기반한 온타리오 주의 통합교육과정을 영재를 위한 통합교육과정 개발에도 적용 가능한지를 살펴보기 위해 온타리오 주의 '정보학 개론' 과목을 국내 과학영재학교의 유사과목인 '정보과학' 과목에 적용해 본 결과, Drake 모형의 탐색 망, KDB 우산, 최종 과제 만들기 단계를 차별화하면 과학영재학교에서 현재 운영 중인 과목에도 충분히 적용 가능하다는 결론을 얻을 수 있었다. 이를 통해 영재를 위한 통합교육과정을 개발하고 실행하기 위해서는 영재들이 학습해야 할 학습 목표, 이해를 보여줄 평가계획, 타학문 또는 실세계 문제와의 통합 경험제공 등을 고려해야 하고 이를 위해 통합교육과정 개발을 위한 교사 협의체를 구성하는 것이 필요하다는 점을 제안하였다. This study aimed to explore the direction and possibility of development of the integrated curriculum for the Gifted students in the discipline-centered curriculum perspective. To this end, the study analysed the Ontario interdisciplinary curriculum based on a Drake's Integration Model which is typical model of the discipline-centered curriculum and explored the applicability to Science Gifted Academy in Korea. Through showing the possibility of enrichment on the selected majors, integration with other disciplines and solving the future problems by the integrated curriculum centered on 'Big Idea', the Ontario interdisciplinary curriculum gave suggestions of curriculum integration within or through individual research and integrated curriculum for the Gifted. The application of the Ontario's "Introduction to Information studies" to "Information Science" in Science Gifted Academy in Korea could be obtained the conclusion that the Drake's Integration model is applied to the Gifted by the individualization of the navigation network, KDB(Knowledge-Do-Be) umbrella, and the final interdisciplinary task. From this result, we could suggest that the development of integrated curriculum for the Gifted should be considered the clarity of learning objectives for the Gifted, the plan of evaluation to demonstrate big understanding and big idea, the integration with other disciplines or real-world problem, as well as the need of teachers council for the integrated curriculum. This study is expected to be contribute to development of the integrated curriculum model for the gifted based on the their characteristics and to be utilized in Science Gifted Academy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.408
Threshold uncertainty score0.209

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it