MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021521947 · doi:10.1353/utq.2006.0234

Royal Spectacle: The 1860 Visit of the Prince of Wales to Canada and the United States (review)

2006· article· en· W2021521947 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
William Westfall

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Art and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpectacleHistoryGenealogyDemographyOptometryAncient historyArchaeologyGeographyPolitical scienceLawMedicineSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Royal Spectacle: The 1860 Visit of the Prince of Wales to Canada and the United States William Westfall (bio) Ian Radforth . Royal Spectacle: The 1860 Visit of the Prince of Wales to Canada and the United StatesUniversity of Toronto Press. xi, 470. $75.00, $39.95 Canadian historians of a certain generation used to point out with some disdain that in 1864 the local press in Charlottetown took a far greater interest in the arrival of the circus than in the deliberations of the colonial politicians who were constructing the Dominion of Canada. After reading Royal Spectacle and the growing number of studies that demonstrate the importance of celebrations, memorials, and other public spectacles in the formation of social, cultural, and national identities, one is now tempted to conclude that the local press made the right choice. In this fine book Ian Radforth examines the visit of the Prince of Wales to Canada and the United States in 1860. Albert Edward came at the invitation of the colonial government to open the Victoria Bridge in Montreal, one of the true engineering marvels of the age. The politics of the visit, of course, ran far deeper. The colony had supported Britain in the Crimean War, and the visit was seen as suitable thanks from a grateful nation. Sending a prince to a colony (Prince Alfred was off to Cape Town at the same time) was also part of an imperial strategy - what Radforth calls 'royal populism' - in which the public display of a royal person was used to celebrate the direct link between the monarchy and the people. For their part the colonists responded to the visit with enthusiasm. Every village and town along the route - from St John's to Windsor - expressed its undying loyalty to Queen and Empire. The prince was processed through the streets and under elaborate arches; he was fêted at receptions, and enchanted with ornate and magical balls. Forced to maintain an exhausting, indeed often numbing, pace, the prince took some relief on the occasional free days when he could play the role of tourist, although when he gazed at the appropriate sites he usually found the locals gazing back. Even the American states seemed determined to welcome the prince (who became Baron Renfrew south of the line) with such fawning gestures that everyone seemed to forget that unfortunate war which had divided Anglosaxondom less than a century before. The popular press on both [End Page 339] sides of the Atlantic wrote up each episode of the trip in fulsome and at times ironic tones; the visit had indeed become a Royal Spectacle. Drawing upon rich archival sources and the insights of scholars who have studied such public moments, Ian Radforth skilfully deconstructs the royal visit at several levels. Always mindful of the political narrative (both local and imperial) which defined and organized the tour, he presents several fascinating portraits of the leading characters, and embellishes the study with many incidents (fashions, menus, and a collapsing dance floor) which can intrigue and delight the reader. Although the book is very long, it is well organized, always accessible, and clearly written. At the centre of the study, however, is a single dominant concern. The book essentially is an elaborate identity story, intent on drawing out what the royal visit reveals about how these colonial communities were constructing their own identities. When the prince and his suite arrived, the British North Americans put themselves on public display, performing through all these elaborate ceremonies important rituals of citizenship. They set out to impress others with their unity of spirit and purpose; but as Radforth reveals time and again such harmony was often more apparent than real. Unity meant something very different in Catholic Quebec from what it meant in the British Protestant towns of Canada West. Women were almost entirely excluded from public roles in these celebrations, although they were able to display themselves at the many balls, which the young prince especially enjoyed. For his part, the colonial secretary, the Duke of Newcastle, excluded people of colour and members of the Orange Order from appearing in their corporate identities before the prince; and the...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.431
Threshold uncertainty score0.868

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.153
Teacher spread0.149 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Toronto QuarterlySame topicHistorical Art and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207