Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce numero de Memoires du livre / Studies in book culture explore un domaine encore peu etudie pour lui-meme : les rapports entre livre et jeu video. Ceux-ci sont generalement inclus dans des etudes intermediatiques plus larges[1], melant differentes approches sans se focaliser sur les liens – pourtant nombreux, comme le present dossier le montre – qui se tissent specifiquement entre ces deux medias. Il faut dire que le desequilibre de legitimite entre ceux-ci tend a compliquer l’analyse, car le regard qu’une certaine culture lettree porte generalement sur le jeu video le cantonne dans un role de loisir de masse qu’il est de bon ton d’ignorer[2] (comme la bande dessinee avant lui dans les annees 1980 et 1990 et les « mauvais genres » paralitteraires encore avant). La question de la legitimite traverse d’ailleurs en filigrane ce dossier. Nous y reviendrons.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".